Archive for the BPL Category

Newspaper Reports “BPL plan is dead in Dallas”

The Dallas Morning News has reported that “an ambitious plan for using power lines to deliver fast Internet service to 2 million Dallas-area homes collapsed Thursday.” Current Group, LLC has announced plans to sell its Dallas BPL network to Oncor, a regulated electric distribution and transmission business, for $90 million. Oncor reportedly has no plans to offer Internet service but will use the network to detect distribution network issues. While Current originally touted the network as a way to offer Internet service to consumers and had entered into a marketing arrangement with DirecTV, the Houston Chronicle quotes Oncor spokesman Chris Schein as confirming that Oncor will use the network only for monitoring the power grid: “Our business is delivering electricity, not being an Internet provider or a television provider.”

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2008/05/02/10078/?nc=1

FCC “Admonishes” Ambient over BPL Issues

The FCC, in a letter to Yehuda Cern, Chief Engineer for Ambient Corporation, concluded their investigation into whether Ambient’s BPL operation caused “harmful interference” to Amateur Radio stations in Briarcliff Manor, New York. The Commission found that “Ambient’s BPL operation has violated the radiated emission limits of Section 15.109″ of the FCC Rules “and the terms of its experimental license, call sign WD2XEQ.” The FCC’s letter went on to say that “we hereby admonish Ambient.” No findings were made, however, as to whether or not the system actually caused interference to Amateur Radio, and the Enforcement Bureau left open the issue of future experimental BPL operations at Briarcliff Manor.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/11/14/100/

NATO releases major report on effects of BPL

NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) has issued a report of the expected effects that widespread BPL application would have on the HF spectrum. Particular emphasis is placed on ambient noise in “quite rural” zones and the “Absolute Protection Requirement”. The calculations assume ubiquitous installation of BPL. The report concludes: a) High probability that BPL would cause increased noise levels at sensitive receiver sites given the projected market penetration; and b) The percentages are highly influenced by assumptions on transmitter EIRP, BPL market penetration, and duty cycle.” The entire report (9MB) can be downloaded at: http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/TR/RTO-TR-IST-050/$$TR-IST-050-ALL.pdf [WIA]

DirecTV Announces Plan to Provide Service via BPL

According to the August 15 edition of The Wall Street Journal, “Satellite-television provider DirecTV announced a wholesale agreement today with Current Group to provide high-speed Internet service over electric-power lines,” otherwise known as broadband over powerlines (BPL). “Broadband over power line is a new technology that allows customers to plug a modem device the size of a cell phone into an electric outlet and connect a cable from their computer for Internet access that is capable of speeds that are faster than some popular Internet plans from cable and phone companies. Current is building out broadband networks in Cincinnati and Dallas-Fort Worth and is in talks with a number of utilities around the world about a commercial rollout,” the Journal said.
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/08/16/102/?nc=1

ARRL Files Objection to Ambient’s BPL Experimental Authorization Renewal Request

On July 25, the ARRL filed an Informal Objection to Ambient Corporation’s request for a renewal of their nationwide experimental authorization that allows them to operate broadband over power line (BPL) operations anywhere in the country they choose. Ambient has been operating its BPL equipment under experimental authorizations for more than five years, an unusual amount of time for an experimental authorization. An Informal Objection is the procedure dictated by the FCC’s Part 5 rules protesting the renewal of an experimental authorization. Currently, Ambient currently operates a BPL system in Briarcliff Manor in Westchester County, New York. Other installations have apparently been shut down by Ambient.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/08/02/101/?nc=1

ARRL Files Federal Court of Appeals Reply Brief over BPL

On July 31, the ARRL filed its reply brief at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This brief follows the FCC’s brief that attempted to rebut the ARRL’s challenge to the FCC’s Broadband over Power Line (BPL) rules enacted in late 2004 and affirmed by the agency in 2006. According to ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, “The FCC’s brief does not accurately describe ARRL’s arguments concerning harmful interference.” The ARRL, in its reply brief, accuses the FCC of, “engaging in misdirection — rebutting hyperbolic arguments ARRL never made, refusing to address the precedents ARRL cited and attempting to rewrite the Orders as if they made factual rather than legal determinations.”

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/08/02/102/?nc=1

FCC Commissioner Lauds BPL in House Testimony; ARRL Responds

On July 24, FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein testified at a House Subcommittee on Telecommuni- cations and the Internet hearing that “three of the many urgent priorities we face” include the need for “a national broadband strategy to ensure the ubiquitous deployment of affordable, high speed broadband infrastructure to this country.” FCC Chairman Kevin Martin and Commissioners Tate, McDowell and Copps testified as well at the “Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission” hearing.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/07/26/100/?nc=1

FCC Responds to ARRL’s BPL Brief

Earlier this week, the FCC filed its reply brief with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The FCC attempted to rebut the ARRL’s challenge to the FCC’s Broadband over Power Line (BPL) rules enacted in late 2004 and affirmed by the agency in 2006. According to ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, “The FCC’s brief does not accurately describe ARRL’s arguments concerning harmful interference.”

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/07/06/104/?nc=1

It Seems to Us: ARRL v. FCC

On May 17, attorneys representing the ARRL filed the initial brief in support of our petition for judicial review of the FCC’s flawed rules governing Access Broadband over Power Line (BPL) systems. This is an important step on the road to what we hope will be a favorable decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2007/07/01/1/?nc=1

Senate Bill Calls on FCC to Investigate BPL Interference Potential

Sen Mark Pryor of Arkansas filed a bill yesterday in the US Senate calling on the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a study on the interference caused by broadband Internet transmission over power lines, otherwise known as BPL. Sen Pryor is a member of the Senate’s Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/06/15/101/